A) confirmation
B) perjury
C) deposition
D) admission
E) acknowledgment
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Complete
B) Merger
C) Adhesion
D) Bilateral
E) Acknowledged
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Disputes are easier to settle when contractual terms are solidified in writing.
B) The moment of writing allows both parties to reconsider terms and ensure what they desire.
C) In general, written contracts aid in the conduct of smooth business contracts.
D) The idea of requiring a writing comes from an English law.
E) All contracts must be in writing in order to be enforced.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Parol evidence contradictory to the final terms is admissible.
B) Parol evidence regarding a contract's subsequent modification is inadmissible.
C) If the agreement is required to be in writing because it is within the statute of frauds, oral modifications are unenforceable.
D) Oral evidence of a subsequent written agreement is inadmissible.
E) If the contract's terms require that modification be in writing, oral modifications are admissible.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the land constituted an asset of the partnership, so the partnership agreement did not come within the statute of frauds.
B) The court ruled that the agreement did involve an interest in land and, therefore, came within the statute of frauds.
C) The court ruled that the agreement did not involve an interest in land but placed it within the statute of frauds in order to prevent injustice.
D) The court ruled that the agreement fell within the statute of frauds but that an oral agreement was sufficient.
E) The court ruled that the agreement to share in the appreciation of the value of the land did not fall within the statute of frauds and that no writing was needed, but that the agreement to share the rental income did fall within the statute of frauds requiring a writing.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Statutes that addressed electronic transactions have been around for years.
B) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act was enacted as law in 2000.
C) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act was adopted as law in only half of all states.
D) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act adopts the requirements of the statute of frauds regarding the validity of online transactions.
E) The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act reflects the decision that particular electronic transactions may constitute a "written copy" and therefore have legal significance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) primary-purpose rule
B) resulting-fact rule
C) main-purpose rule
D) delineated rule
E) personal-obligation standard
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because the agreement is for the sale of goods over $500, which is within the statute of frauds and must be in writing.
B) No, because the agreement involved the lease of goods and must be in writing.
C) Yes, because the agreement involved the lease of goods, which need not be in writing
D) Yes, because the contract can be performed within one year.
E) No, because the contract may not be performed within one year.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Words establishing penalties
B) Speech or words, specifically words outside the original writing
C) Oral speech as opposed to written words
D) Written words as opposed to oral speech
E) Signature required
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Secondary obligation.
B) Secondary promise.
C) Collateral promise.
D) Suretyship promise.
E) Promissory estoppel.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Act to Prevent Unjust Contracts
B) Prevention of Frauds Act
C) Perjury Prevention Act
D) Act for the Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries
E) Act of the Queen against Frauds
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The statement has no effect because of the statute of frauds.
B) The statement would be excluded from consideration as parol evidence but only because it involved an amount in excess of $5,000.
C) The judge would be estopped from considering the evidence.
D) The statement would be classified as an admission and would establish an exception to the statute of frauds involving the agreement on the house.
E) The statement would be excluded from consideration because of the collateral interest rule.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) promissory estoppel
B) substantial estoppel
C) the promissory rule
D) the reliance rule
E) promissory reliance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, but only if there is another writing with the $20 price per tuner.
B) Yes, because the written agreement was conditioned on the $20 per tuner oral agreement.
C) No, because he failed to include price in the writing.
D) No, because the parol evidence rule prevents parties from introducing oral evidence when there is a written contract.
E) No, because no exception applies to the parol evidence rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Promissory estoppel
B) Elementary promises
C) Debt reconciliation
D) Debtor's friend
E) Secondary obligation
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams