FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 5: Gross Income: Exclusions

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 31

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Kristen's employer owns its building and provides parking space for its employees. The value of the free parking is $150 per month. Karen's employer does not have parking facilities, but reimburses its employee for the cost of parking in a nearby garage, up to $150 per month.

A) Kristen and Karen must recognize gross income from the parking services.
B) Kristen can exclude the employer provided parking from gross income, but Karen must include her reimbursement in gross income.
C) Kristen must include the value of the employer provided parking from her gross income, but Karen can exclude her reimbursement from gross income.
D) Neither Kristen nor Karen is required to include the cost of parking in gross income.
E) None of these.

F) C) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 32

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Stuart owns 300 shares of Turquoise Corporation stock and 2,000 shares of Blue Corporation stock. During the year, Stuart received 150 shares of Turquoise as a result of a 1 for 2 stock split. The value of the shares received was $4,800. Stuart also received 100 shares of Blue Corporation stock as a result of a 5% stock dividend. Stuart did not have the option of receiving cash from Blue. The additional shares he received had a value of $7,200. Stuart's gross income from the receipt of the additional Turquoise and Blue shares is:

A) $0.
B) $4,800.
C) $7,200.
D) $12,000.
E) None of these.

F) B) and E)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 33

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

A U.S. citizen worked in a foreign country for the period July 1, 2016 through August 1, 2017. Her salary was $10,000 per month. Also, in 2016 she received $5,000 in dividends from foreign corporations (not qualified dividends) . No dividends were received in 2017. Which of the following is correct?

A company has a medical reimbursement plan for officers that covers all costs that the insurer will not pay. However, for all employees who are not officers, the medical reimbursement plan applies only after the employee has paid $1,000 from his or her own funds. An officer incurred $1,500 in medical expenses and was reimbursed for that amount. An hourly worker also incurred $1,500 in medical expense and was reimbursed $500.

Gull Corporation was undergoing reorganization under the bankruptcy laws. The shareholders, who had made loans of $300,000 to the corporation, agreed to accept additional stock with a value of $200,000 instead of repayment on the debt. The Old Line Insurance Company, which had a $400,000 mortgage on the building, agreed to reduce the principal to $250,000. A trade creditor with a receivable of $150,000 from the company agreed to accept $70,000 in full payment for the debt incurred to purchase goods that were still on hand. Finally, the company transferred some equipment with an adjusted basis of $90,000 in satisfaction of a liability for $120,000. Compute the corporation's gross income and other adjustments necessary as a result of the above transactions.

The exclusion for health insurance premiums paid by the employer applies to:

Carla is a deputy sheriff. Her employer requires that she live in the county where she is employed. Housing is very expensive; so the county agreed to pay her $4,800 per year to cover the higher cost of housing. Carla must include the housing supplement in her gross income.

A U.S. citizen who works in France from February 1, 2017 until January 31, 2018 is eligible for the foreign earned income exclusion in 2017 and 2018.

Nicole's employer pays her $150 per month towards the cost of parking near a railway station where Nicole catches the train to work. The employer also pays the cost of the rail pass, $75 per month. Nicole can exclude both of these payments from her gross income.

Agnes receives a $5,000 scholarship which covers her tuition at Parochial High School. She may not exclude the $5,000 because the exclusion applies only to scholarships to attend college.

Adam repairs power lines for the Egret Utilities Company. He is generally working on a power line during the lunch hour. He must eat when and where he can and still get his work done. He usually purchases something at a convenience store and eats in his truck. Egret reimburses Adam for the cost of his meals.

Sonja is a United States citizen who has worked in Spain for the past 10 months. She received $8,000 a month as compensation. Her employer has offered to extend Sonja's contract to work in Spain for another 6 months at the same rate of pay. If she rejects the offer, she can return to the United States and receive a salary of $10,000 per month. While working in Spain, she is subject to the Spain income tax, which is approximately 11% of her gross pay. The marginal tax rate on her income taxed in the United States is 25%. Compare Sonja's after-tax income assuming she remains in Spain with her after-tax income if she returns to the United States.

Louise works in a foreign branch of her employer's business. She earned $5,000 per month throughout the relevant period. Which of the following is correct:

Margaret is trying to decide whether to place funds in a qualified tuition program. Her son will be attending college in 4 years. She is in the 35% marginal tax bracket and she believes she can earn an 7% before tax return on alternative investments. Thus, $10,000 will accumulate to $11,948 (after-tax) in 4 years. Margaret expects tuition to increase at the rate of 5% each year to $12,155 in 4 years. Her son will be in the 15% marginal tax bracket in all relevant years. Given these assumptions, should Margaret participate in the qualified tuition program?

Peggy is an executive for the Tan Furniture Manufacturing Company. Peggy purchased furniture from the company for $9,500, the price Tan ordinarily would charge a wholesaler for the same items. The retail price of the furniture was $12,500, and Tan's cost was $9,000. The company also paid for Peggy's parking space in a garage near the office. The parking fee was $600 for the year. All employees are allowed to buy furniture at a discounted price comparable to that charged to Peggy. However, the company does not pay other employees' parking fees. Peggy's gross income from the above is:

The employees of Mauve Accounting Services are permitted to use the copy machine for personal purposes, provided the privilege is not abused. Ed is the president of a civic organization and uses the copier to make several copies of the organization's agenda for its meetings. The copies made during the year would have cost $150 at a local office supply.

Matilda works for a company with 1,000 employees. The company has a hospitalization insurance plan that covers all employees. However, the employee must pay the first $3,000 of his or her medical expenses each year. Each year, the employer contributes $1,500 to each employee's health savings account (HSA) . Matilda's employer made the contributions in 2016 and 2017, and the account earned $100 interest in 2017. At the end of 2017, Matilda withdrew $3,100 from the account to pay the deductible portion of her medical expenses for the year and other medical expenses not covered by the hospitalization insurance policy. As a result, Matilda must include in her 2017 gross income:

Heather's interest and gains on investments for the current year are as follows: ​ Heather's adjusted gross income from the above is: or; ​ Heather must report gross income in the amount of: ​

As an executive of Cherry, Inc., Ollie receives a fringe benefit in the form of annual tuition scholarships of $10,000 to each of his three children. The scholarships are paid by the company on behalf of the children of key employees directly to each child's educational institution and are payable only if the student maintains a B average.

Albert had a terminal illness which required almost constant nursing care for the remaining two years of his estimated life, according to his doctor. Albert had a life insurance policy with a face amount of $100,000. Albert had paid $25,000 of premiums on the policy. The insurance company has offered to pay him $80,000 to cancel the policy, although its cash surrender value was only $55,000. Albert accepted the $80,000. Albert used $15,000 to pay his medical expenses. Albert made a miraculous recovery and lived another 20 years. As a result of cashing in the policy: