Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) No, because she has no legal liability and is acting as a volunteer.
B) No, because only Christen is liable on the assignment.
C) Yes, but she would only be entitled to recover one half of the amounts because she and Doug are jointly liable to Dusty.
D) Only if Doug specifically agreed by contract when he accepted the premises to reimburse her.
E) Yes, Christen would have a right of reimbursement from Doug.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A tenant is responsible for carpet that becomes worn.
B) A tenant is responsible for negligent damages to an apartment.
C) A tenant has a duty not to commit waste.
D) A tenant had a duty not to cause substantial injury to the landlord's property.
E) A tenant may not cut down trees in the yard of rental property.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Leases must always be in writing in order to be enforceable.
B) When the lease term exceeds 9 months.
C) When the lease term exceeds 1 year.
D) When the lease term exceeds 18 months.
E) When the lease term exceeds 2 years.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Allowable-term
B) Periodic-tenancy
C) Tenancy-at-will
D) Tenancy-at-sufferance
E) Definite-term
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) None
B) The covenant of real use
C) The covenant of advantageous business practices
D) The covenant of fair use
E) The covenant of quiet enjoyment
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Reasonable action
B) Full eviction
C) Partial eviction
D) Constructive eviction
E) True eviction
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the FHA only prohibits discrimination against the physically disabled, not individuals who have cognitive disabilities.
B) That the defendant did not violate the FHA because zoning regulations prevented renting the dwelling at issue to three or more unrelated people as requested.
C) That the defendant did not violate the FHA because of the reasonable belief on the part of the defendant that the proposed renters would commit substantial waste and damage.
D) That the defendant did not violate the FHA because the defendant established that more desirable renters than the disabled applicants at issue were willing to rent the property at issue.
E) That the defendant violated the FHA.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that as a matter of law the landlord had no duty to control any actions of the other tenant and that the right to take action against the other tenant belonged to the plaintiff.
B) The court ruled that the terms of the lease controlled and that because the lease gave the plaintiff the affirmative right to take court action in such cases, the landlord had no duty to do so.
C) The court ruled that by failing to act to protect the plaintiff, the landlord was liable to the plaintiff for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment.
D) The court ruled that only because the lease itself placed a duty of quiet enjoyment on the landlord, the landlord had a duty to control the actions of the upstairs tenant.
E) The court ruled that since the actions of the tenant did not constitute a physical danger to the plaintiff, the landlord had no duty to control the actions of the tenant.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Forfeiture
B) Violation
C) Refusal
D) Negation
E) Surrender
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Conrad is correct.
B) Conrad is incorrect because while he has the right to pay the same amount, Brenda has the right to assign the right to receive the payments to Greg or someone else unless the lease terms prevent her from doing so.
C) Conrad is correct only if he gave notice to Brenda prior to the sale that he objected to it.
D) Conrad is correct only if there is less than one year left on his lease agreement.
E) Conrad is correct because Brenda had no right to transfer ownership in the first place.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled in favor of the landlord on the basis that the Fair Housing Act did not have sections requiring accommodation.
B) The court ruled in favor of the landlord on the basis that while accommodations may be required at times under the Fair Housing Act, assisting with cleaning is not one of them.
C) The court ruled in favor of the tenant on the basis that the tenant had established a reasonable basis supporting the need of reasonable accommodation in regard to cleaning.
D) The court ruled in favor of the tenant on the basis that the tenant was caused additional stress due to harassment regarding rent and that, therefore, the landlord was responsible for providing assistance with cleaning.
E) The appellate court remanded the case to the lower court for consideration of the facts according to the test outlined in its decision for determining if a requested accommodation is required.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If an injury occurs on residential premises because of a condition that the landlord knew or should have known about, the landlord can be held responsible for the injury.
B) If the landlord is aware of a dangerous condition but does not make the tenant aware of the condition, the landlord will be responsible for any resulting injury.
C) If the landlord is aware of a dangerous condition but hides the condition from the tenant, the landlord will be responsible for any resulting injury.
D) If premises are used for commercial purposes, the landlord has a responsibility to ensure that the premises are in reasonably good condition before the tenant takes control of the property.
E) If the premises are used for commercial purposes, the landlord is responsible for maintaining the premises.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only the right to withhold rent.
B) Only the right to bring suit against Holly for damages.
C) Only the right to bring suit against Holly for breach of contract.
D) The right to not pay rent, and the right to bring suit against Holly for damages or breach of contract.
E) He has no rights unless he can prove that he at all times had acted reasonably toward Holly in the air conditioning dispute.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Landlord or lessor
B) Landlord or lessee
C) Holder or lessor
D) Holder or lessee
E) Holdee or lessee
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 65
Related Exams